|The Collapse of Moore’s Law: Physicist Says It’s Already Happening|
Moore’s Law is finally breaking down, according to theoretical physicist Michio Kaku. He’s talking about the so-called law that says the number of transistors that can be fit on a computer chip will double every two years, resulting in periodic increases in computing power.
According to Kaku:
It’s true. At the International Supercomputing Conference 2011 last June, Intel architecture group VP Kirk Skaugen said something about Moore’s Law not being sufficient, by itself, for the company to ramp up to exascale performance by 2018. But he went on to tout Intel’s tri-gate technology (the company’s so-called “3D” processors) as the solution, which Skaugen claimed translates to “no more end of life for Moore’s Law.”
Moore’s Law, introduced by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in a 1965 paper, was never a law in any scientific sense — it’s always been more a rule of thumb (that, and “Moore’s Rule” sounds so much less authoritative). And as others have pointed out, given Intel’s dominance in the chip industry for much of the period in which Moore’s Law has applied (or appeared to), there’s a self-fulfilling prophecy angle in which the dominant industry player sets the pace for its own benefit.
Moore also clarified in a 2003 interview that the idea of computer power doubling every 18 months — sometimes mistaken as the basis of Moore’s Law — was advanced by Intel’s David House. While such performance gains could be achieved by Moore’s prediction that transistor counts would double every two years, House apparently calculated that transistors would get faster as well, resulting in computing performance doubling every 18 months (in a later 2005 interview, Moore admitted “we’re doing a little better than [24 months]“).
Despite Intel’s recent advances with tri-gate processors, Kaku argues the company has merely prolonged the inevitable: the law’s collapse due to heat and leakage issues.
“So there is an ultimate limit set by the laws of thermal dynamics and set by the laws of quantum mechanics as to how much computing power you can do with silicon,” says Kaku, noting “That’s the reason why the age of silicon will eventually come to a close,” and arguing that Moore’s Law could “flatten out completely” by 2022.
Where do we go once Gordon Moore’s axiom runs out of steam? Kaku hypothesizes several options: protein computers, DNA computers, optical computers, quantum computers and molecular computers. And then he makes a bet:
Kaku then invokes parallelism as another stop-gap measure, a concept that’s been around for decades, but assuming the exponential requirements for processing power hold, “Sooner or later even three-dimensional chips, even parallel processing, will be exhausted and we’ll have to go to the post-silicon era,” says Kaku.
How would a molecular computer work? Imagine molecules in the shape of a valve, says Kaku.
But molecular computing has mass production issues because — surprise! — molecules are teeny-tiny. Why in the world, then, would Kaku invoke even smaller particle-based computers as a viable alternative?
Because quantum computing could produce the “ultimate computer.” Kaku doesn’t explain why, but I’ll summarize: Digital computers set bits to either “0″ or “1,” but in a quantum computer, the bits can be “0″ and “1,” at the same time, allowing for incredibly fast calculations according to a principle called “superposition.” The problem, and you knew there’d be one, is something called “decoherence.” Kaku explains:
Given that, Kaku says that when Moore’s Law finally collapses by the end of the next decade, we’ll “simply tweak [it] a bit with chip-like computers in three dimensions.” Beyond that, he says “we may have to go to molecular computers and perhaps late in the 21st century quantum computers.”
Newer news items:
Older news items:
by Ayaz Nanji | shared from MarketingProfs Some 66% of small-business owners are using mobile devices and/or mobile solutions as part of their operations, according to a recent report from Constant Contact. Of those small-business owners using mobile devices, 73% said they use their phones or tablets to...
by Hank Blank | shared from The UPS Store Often when I talk to small business owners about networking many say they have no time to network. They are too busy. I have heard that many times. Who isn’t busy today? I also know that many small business owners have simply selected the wrong priorities in allocating their...
by Eric Michaels | shared from The UPS Store To make your business grow, you need the help of the latest technology. No matter what device or operating system you use to power your business, there's a way to get technology on your side. These six essential apps for small business owners do the work for you. 1....
by Lara Galloway, The Mom Biz Coach, www.MomBiz.com Having my first child ten years ago made me a mother. And starting my business eight years ago made me an entrepreneur. I can’t say I had any idea what either of those terms really meant before they happened to me. But here are a few things I’ve learned since then about what it means...
by Dr Billy M. | shared from The UPS Store Kicking off a business initiative can be overwhelming, but often, just starting is the hardest part. Many people find themselves starting a small business from home as a result of such life-changing events as retirement or parenthood. A business based at home will benefit you personally by eliminating a...
by Michael Mothner | shared from Inc. Over the past five years, social media has become an increasingly important part of many companies' marketing strategies. But there are still some misconceptions about how to use social media to drive sales and which services are worth the investment of company time and resources. Here are the six...